|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Normal Science, Pathological Science and Psychometrics
Joel Michell
University of Sydney, joelm{at}psych.usyd.edu.au
A pathology of science is defined as a two-level breakdown in processes of critical inquiry: first, a hypothesis is accepted without serious attempts being made to test it; and, second, this first-level failure is ignored. Implications of this concept of pathology of science for the Kuhnian concept of normal science are explored. It is then shown that the hypothesis upon which psychometrics stands, the hypothesis that some psychological attributes are quantitative, has never been critically tested. Furthermore, it is shown that psychometrics has avoided investigating this hypothesis through endorsing an anomalous definition of measurement. In this way, the failure to test this key hypothesis is not only ignored but disguised. It is concluded that psychometrics is a pathology of science, and an explanation of this fact is found in the influence of Pythagoreanism upon the development of quantitative psychology.
Key Words: measurement • normal science • pathology of science • psychometrics • quantification
Theory & Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 5,
639-667 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354300105004
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
F. J. Hibberd
John Anderson's development of (situational) realism and its bearing on psychology today
History of the Human Sciences,
October 1, 2009;
22(4):
63 - 92.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Trendler
Measurement Theory, Psychology and the Revolution That Cannot Happen
Theory Psychology,
October 1, 2009;
19(5):
579 - 599.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Boag
`Mind as Feeling' or Affective Relations?: A Contribution to the School of Andersonian Realism
Theory Psychology,
August 1, 2008;
18(4):
505 - 525.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Kyngdon
The Rasch Model from the Perspective of the Representational Theory of Measurement
Theory Psychology,
February 1, 2008;
18(1):
89 - 109.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Michell
Conjoint Measurement and the Rasch Paradox: A Response to Kyngdon
Theory Psychology,
February 1, 2008;
18(1):
119 - 124.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Borsboom and G. J. Mellenbergh
Why Psychometrics is Not Pathological: A Comment on Michell
Theory Psychology,
February 1, 2004;
14(1):
105 - 120.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Michell
Item Response Models, Pathological Science and the Shape of Error: Reply to Borsboom and Mellenbergh
Theory Psychology,
February 1, 2004;
14(1):
121 - 129.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Michell
Epistemology of Measurement: The Relevance of its History for Quantification in the Social Sciences
Social Science Information,
December 1, 2003;
42(4):
515 - 534.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. P. Fisher Jr.
Mathematics, Measurement, Metaphor and Metaphysics I: Implications for Method in Postmodern Science
Theory Psychology,
December 1, 2003;
13(6):
753 - 790.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. P. Fisher Jr.
Mathematics, Measurement, Metaphor and Metaphysics II: Accounting for Galileo's 'Fateful Omission'
Theory Psychology,
December 1, 2003;
13(6):
791 - 828.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Michell
The Quantitative Imperative: Positivism, Naive Realism and the Place of Qualitative Methods in Psychology
Theory Psychology,
February 1, 2003;
13(1):
5 - 31.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Michell
Pragmatism, Positivism and the Quantitative Imperative
Theory Psychology,
February 1, 2003;
13(1):
45 - 52.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. J. Hibberd
Reply to Gergen
Theory Psychology,
October 1, 2002;
12(5):
685 - 694.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
