Theory & Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lamont, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Theory & Psychology, Vol. 17, No. 5, 681-696 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354307081624

Paranormal Belief and the Avowal of Prior Scepticism

Peter Lamont

UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH, Peter.Lamont{at}ed.ac.uk

A common way in which people warrant their belief in the paranormal is by employing an avowal of prior scepticism. That such avowals are used so often, and cited by others as relevant, suggest they are an effective means of warranting not only the facticity of ostensibly paranormal events but also a belief about the paranormal nature of the event. Their function, it is argued, is to head off potential accusations of gullibility or wishful thinking, and they are analogous to avowals of prior belief by `sceptics', which head off potential accusations of narrow-mindedness. However, such avowals also point up key theoretical and methodological problems in current paranormal belief research. Problems of representation and constitution are discussed, and greater stress upon functional aspects of expressions of paranormal belief is suggested.

Key Words: belief • discursive psychology • history • mind-reading • paranormal • psychokinesis • rhetoric • scepticism

References

  • Alcock, J. (1981). Parapsychology: Science or magic? New York: Pergamon .
  • Alcock, J., & Otis, L.P. (1980). Critical thinking and belief in the paranormal . Psychological Reports, 46, 479—482 .[ISI]
  • Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identities in talk. London: SAGE .
  • Auton, H., Pope, J., & Seeger, G. (2003). It isn't that strange: Paranormal belief and personality traits . Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 711—720 .
  • Banziger, G. (1983). Normalizing the paranormal: Short-term and long-term change in belief in the paranormal among older learners during a short course . Teaching of Psychology, 10, 212—214 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Beattie, J. (1877). A critique and protest . Spiritual Magazine, 5, 552—554 .
  • Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
  • Blackmore, S. (1997). Probability misjudgment and belief in the paranormal: A newspaper survey . British Journal of Psychology, 88, 683—689 .[ISI]
  • Blackmore, S. (2000, November). First person—into the unknown . New Scientist, 4, 55 .
  • Blackmore, S., & Moore, R. (1994). Seeing things: Visual recognition and belief in the paranormal . European Journal of Parapsychology, 88, 683—689 .
  • Brugger, P., Regard, M., Landis, T., Cook, N., Krebs, D., & Neiderberger, J. (1993). ` Meaningful' patterns in visual noise: Effects of lateral stimulation and the observer's belief in ESP . Psychopathology, 26, 261—265 .[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Burns, J. (1869). Passing events . Spiritual Magazine, 4, 461 .
  • Clarke, D. (1995). Experience and other reasons given for belief and disbelief in paranormal and religious phenomena . Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 60, 371—384 .
  • Coelho, C. (2005). Constructing parapsychology: A discourse analysis of accounts of experimental parapsychologists . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
  • Couttie, B. (1988). Forbidden knowledge: The paranormal paradox. Cambridge: Lutterworth Press .
  • Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: SAGE .
  • Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: SAGE .
  • Emmons, C.F., & Sobal, J. (1981). Paranormal beliefs: Testing the marginality hypothesis . Sociological Focus, 14, 49—56 .[ISI]
  • Gilovich, T. (1991). How we know what isn't so: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life. New York: Free Press .
  • Gray, T. (1984). University course reduces belief in paranormal . Skeptical Inquirer, 8, 247—251 .
  • Haraldsson, E. (1985). Representative national surveys of psychic phenomena: Iceland, Great Britain, Sweden, USA and Gallup's multinational survey . Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 53, 145—158 .
  • Hergovich, A. (2004). The effect of pseudo-psychic demonstrations as dependent on belief in paranormal phenomena and suggestibility . Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 365—380 [CrossRef][ISI]
  • Home, D.D. (1863). Incidents in my life. London: F. Pitman .
  • Home, Mme. (1921). D.D. Home: His life and mission. London : Kegan, Paul, Trench & Trubner .
  • Hutchison, M. (1991). Interview with Paul Daniels . The Skeptic, 5, 7 .
  • Irwin, H.J. (1989). On paranormal disbelief: The psychology of the sceptic. In G. Zollschan, J.F. Schumaker, & G.F. Walsh (Eds.) Exploring the paranormal: Perspectives on belief and experience (pp. 305—312). Bridport: Prism Press .
  • Irwin, H.J. (1990). Fantasy proneness and paranormal beliefs . Psychological Reports, 66, 665—658 .
  • Irwin, H.J. (1991). A study of paranormal belief, psychological adjustment, and fantasy proneness . Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 85, 317—331 .[ISI]
  • Irwin, H.J. (1992). Origins and functions of paranormal belief: The role of childhood trauma and interpersonal control . Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 86, 199—208 .[ISI]
  • Irwin, H. (1993). Paranormal belief: A review of the empirical literature . Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 87, 1—39 .[ISI]
  • Jefferson, G. (1984). "At first I thought": A normalizing device for extraordinary events . Unpublished manuscript, Katholieke Hogeschool Tilburg.
  • ` J.J.S .' (1860, January). Letter to Spiritual Magazine, 1, p. 233 .
  • Jones, J. (1869). Spiritualism in Norwood . Spiritual Magazine, 4, 336 .
  • Lamont, P. (2004). Spiritualism and a mid-Victorian crisis of evidence . Historical Journal, 47, 897—920 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Lamont, P. (2006). Critically thinking about paranormal belief. In S. Della Sala (Ed.), Tall tales: Popular myths about the mind and brain (pp. 23—35). Oxford: Oxford University Press .
  • Lange, R., & Houran, J. (2000). Modeling Maher's attribution theory of delusions as a cusp catastrophe . Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology and Life Sciences, 4, 235—254 .[CrossRef]
  • Lawrence, T.R. (1995). How many factors of paranormal belief are there? A critique of the paranormal belief scale . Journal of Parapsychology, 59, 3—25 .[ISI]
  • Lawrence, T.R., Edwards, C., Barraclough, N., Churchy, S., & Hetherington, F. (1995). Modelling childhood causes of paranormal belief and experience: Childhood trauma and childhood fantasy . Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 209—215 .[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Lawrence, T.R., Roe, C.A., & Williams, C. (1998). On obliquity and the PBS: Thoughts on Tobacyk and Thomas (1997). Journal of Parapsychology, 62, 147—151.
  • London Dialectical Society. (1873). Report on spiritualism. London: James Burns .
  • Margolis, J. (1998). Uri Geller: Magician or mystic? London: Orion .
  • Newport, F., & Stausberg, M. (2001). Americans' belief in psychic and paranormal phenomena is up over last decade. Princeton, NJ : Gallup News Service .
  • Otis, L.P., & Alcock, J. (1982). Factors affecting extraordinary belief . Journal of Social Psychology, 118, 77—85 .[ISI]
  • Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: SAGE .
  • Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. London: SAGE .
  • Randall, T.M. (1990). Belief in the paranormal declines: 1977—1987 . Psychological Reports, 66, 1347—1351 .[ISI]
  • Randi, J. (1975). The magic of Uri Geller. New York: Ballantine .
  • Review of Uri Geller: Magician or mystic ? (1998, 11 December). Jewish Chronicle. Retrieved 29 March 2007 from: http://www.uri-geller.com/margrev.htm
  • Review of Uri Geller: Magician or mystic ? (1999a, 1 August). Sunday Telegraph. Retrieved 29 March 2007 from: http://www.uri-geller.com/margrev.htm
  • Review of Uri Geller: Magician or mystic ? (1999b, 15 August). Sunday Mercury. Retrieved 29 March 2007 from: http://www.uri-geller.com/margrev.htm
  • Singer, B., & Benassi, V.A. (1981). Occult beliefs . American Scientist, 69, 49—55 .[ISI]
  • Singh, S. (2003, 5 June). I'll bet £1,000 that Derren can't read my mind . Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 29 March 2007 from http://www.simonsingh.net/Derren_Brown_Article.html
  • Smith, M.D., Foster, C.L., & Stovin, G. (1998). Intelligence and paranormal belief: Examining the role of context . Journal of Parapsychology, 62, 65—77 .[ISI]
  • Thalbourne, M. (1995). Psychological characteristics of believers in the paranormal: A replicative study . Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 89, 153—164 .[ISI]
  • Tobacyk, J. (1988). A revised paranormal belief scale . Unpublished manuscript, Louisiana Tech University.
  • Tobacyk, J., Miller, M., Murphy, P., & Mitchell, T. (1988). Comparisons of paranormal beliefs of black and white university students from the southern United States . Psychological Reports, 63, 492—494 .[ISI]
  • Webster, Mrs. (1865). Scepticism and spiritualism: The experiences of a sceptic by the authoress of Aurelia. London: F. Pitman .
  • Wiseman, R., & Morris, R.L. (1995). Recalling pseudo-psychic phenomena . British Journal of Psychology, 86, 113—125 .[ISI]
  • Wiseman, R., & Watt, C. (2006). Belief in psychic ability and the misattribution hypothesis: A qualitative review . British Journal of Psychology, 97, 323—338 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Wooffitt, R. (1992). Telling tales of the unexpected: The organization of factual discourse. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf .
  • Wooffitt, R., & Allistone, S. (2005). Towards a discursive parapsychology: Language and the laboratory study of anomalous communication. Theory & Psychology, 15, 325—355 .
  • Wuthnow, R. (1976). Astrology and marginality . Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 15, 157—168 .[CrossRef][ISI]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lamont, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?