Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theory & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maze, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Henry, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Psychoanalysis, Epistemology and Intersubjectivity

Theories of Wilfred Bion

John R. Maze

University of Sydney

Rachael M. Henry

University of Wollongong

The inference to other minds by analogy with one's own is unconvincing, yet all our social interactions assume we can identify others' beliefs and intentions. The problem is acute for psychoanalysis as it is especially concerned with unconscious mental processes. W.R. Bion offered recommendations for true psychoanalytic knowledge, and concepts such as projective identification and counter-transference are related. Bion's special study was of psychotic thought. His explanation of its underlying mechanism was in terms of a breakdown in cognitive processing at the transition from sensory impressions to conceptual thought, an epistemology familiar in academic processing theories. Conceptual difficulties in such theories are discussed. It is argued that realistic epistemology escapes them and can embrace psychotic thought.

Theory & Psychology, Vol. 6, No. 3, 401-421 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354396063004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
A. C. Dean
Splitting in Normal and Pathological Populations from the Perspective of Predictive Control Theory: A Reconceptualization
Theory Psychology, February 1, 2004; 14(1): 29 - 55.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
J.R. Maze
Social Constructionism, Deconstructionism and Some Requirements of Discourse
Theory Psychology, June 1, 2001; 11(3): 393 - 417.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
H. J. Stam
Ten Years after, Decade to Come: The Contributions of Theory to Psychology
Theory Psychology, February 1, 2000; 10(1): 5 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]