This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Shotter, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A `Show' of Agency is Enough

University Of New Hampshire, jds{at}hopper.unh.edu

Descartes and Cartesians such as Harwood Fisher (1995) claim that human agency is only known to us as such intellectually, through supposed linguistically indifferent concepts or ideas of agency centering it unproblematically in isolated individuals. In claiming, as I do, that our different ways of being an agent are socially constructed, I do not deny that individuals may have a unique sense of the relation of their own activity to their own circumstances, or that they initially react in unique ways to shows of agency in others. But what I do deny is that when formulating claims as to the meaning of their own activities, individuals should be treated as the sole authorities as to the appropriate voicing of any such claims. Fisher fails to notice the ineradicably linguistic and normative nature of our everyday social relations to each other.

Theory & Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 3, 383-390 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354395053006


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. S. Held What Follows?: Mind Dependence, Fallibility and Transcendence According to (Strong) Constructionism's Realist and Quasi-Realist Critics Theory Psychology, October 1, 2002; 12(5): 651 - 669. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. J. Stam Ten Years after, Decade to Come: The Contributions of Theory to Psychology Theory Psychology, February 1, 2000; 10(1): 5 - 21. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Larner Through a Glass Darkly: Narrative as Destiny Theory Psychology, August 1, 1998; 8(4): 549 - 572. [Abstract]

				A. E. Dodds, J. A. Lawrence, and J. Valsiner The Personal and the Social: Mead's Theory of the `Generalized Other' Theory Psychology, August 1, 1997; 7(4): 483 - 503. [Abstract]

				H. Fisher Empty Sets or Empty Self: A Response to Comments on `Whose Right is it to Define the Self?' Theory Psychology, August 1, 1995; 5(3): 391 - 400. [Abstract]