This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Harré, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Necessity of Personhood as Embodied Being

Oxford University And Georgetown University

The ontology presupposed in discursive psychology takes persons to be originating centres of activity. Since they are ontologically elementary they have no internal psychological complexity. As with the elementary charges and poles that ground the ontology of physics, they are specified wholly in terms of their dispositions and powers. A second important feature of the social constructionist strain in discursive psychology is the thesis that cognitive processes are properties of discourses, and hence have their primary mode of being in interpersonal symbolic interactions. Persons are singularities and each has its unique attributes. Singularity of personhood is tied up with singularity of embodiment, deeply involved in the human sense of self. In a similar manner the discursive thesis that emotion displays are embodied expressions of judgements also brings the fact of embodiment to the centre of psychological theory. These considerations dispose of the greater part of Fisher's (1995) criticisms of the discursive/constructionist position. We are embodied beings and the rules of discourses are not arbitrary.

Theory & Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 3, 369-373 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354395053004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Wortham Book Reviews Discourse Studies, May 1, 2001; 3(2): 253 - 255. [PDF]

				J. Quigley Psychology and Grammar: The Construction of the Autobiographical Self Theory Psychology, April 1, 2001; 11(2): 147 - 170. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. N. Williams and M. S. Beyers Personalism, Social Constructionism and the Foundation of the Ethical Theory Psychology, February 1, 2001; 11(1): 119 - 134. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. P. O'Connor and R. S. Hallam Sorcery of the Self: The Magic of You Theory Psychology, April 1, 2000; 10(2): 238 - 264. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Markova' The Individual and Society in Psychological Theory Theory Psychology, February 1, 2000; 10(1): 107 - 116. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Larner Through a Glass Darkly: Narrative as Destiny Theory Psychology, August 1, 1998; 8(4): 549 - 572. [Abstract]

				A. E. Dodds, J. A. Lawrence, and J. Valsiner The Personal and the Social: Mead's Theory of the `Generalized Other' Theory Psychology, August 1, 1997; 7(4): 483 - 503. [Abstract]

				H. Fisher Empty Sets or Empty Self: A Response to Comments on `Whose Right is it to Define the Self?' Theory Psychology, August 1, 1995; 5(3): 391 - 400. [Abstract]