Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theory & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Whose Right is it to Define the Self?

Harwood Fisher

Crry College Of The Crry University Of New York, 76071.2575{at}compuserve.com

Descartes founded the psychology of the individual with a mind! body distinction that calls for internal dialogue and interactive exchange. Individuals struggle with their nature through an intracommunicative system, emanating not from social exchanges, but, instead, from autonomous rules and constraints inherent in the machine of the body. The attacks on these ideas by social constructionists, such as Gergen, Harré and Shotter, impel me to write this paper. My purpose is to show how rejection of Descartes's Cogito; ergo sum, and of his idea that the human being struggles with feelings directed by the body and beliefs formed in the soul, eliminates criteria necessary for concepts of the self and the person. I argue that social constructionist reductions of mind and body to social process disallow a causal basis for self and its autonomously generated origins. The same reductions substitute contextual determination for cause and effect logic, clouding accounts of an individual's choices and decisions and making the attribution of personal moral responsibility impossible. I demonstrate that the bases for maintaining the criteria of self and person flow from the Cartesian tradition, have a wide support among many trenchant thinkers in psychology and remain logically necessary.

Theory & Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 3, 323-352 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354395053001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
H. Fisher
Categories and Embodied Objects: The Subjective Self and the Psychologist within Natural Psychology
Theory Psychology, April 1, 2003; 13(2): 239 - 262.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
H. J. Stam
Introduction: Social Constructionism and its Critics
Theory Psychology, June 1, 2001; 11(3): 291 - 296.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
K. R. Malone
Subjectivity and the Address to the Other: A Lacanian View of Some Impasses in Theory and Psychology
Theory Psychology, February 1, 2000; 10(1): 79 - 86.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
H. Fisher
Postmodern Agency: You and I Can Show it; Not Own it
Theory Psychology, February 1, 1999; 9(1): 103 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
K. J. Gergen
Agency: Social Construction and Relational Action
Theory Psychology, February 1, 1999; 9(1): 113 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
K. J. Gergen
The Place of the Psyche in a Constructed World
Theory Psychology, December 1, 1997; 7(6): 723 - 746.
[Abstract]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
A. E. Dodds, J. A. Lawrence, and J. Valsiner
The Personal and the Social: Mead's Theory of the `Generalized Other'
Theory Psychology, August 1, 1997; 7(4): 483 - 503.
[Abstract]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
M. Freeman
Groping in the Light
Theory Psychology, August 1, 1995; 5(3): 353 - 360.
[Abstract]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
M. Gergen
Postmodern, Post-Cartesian Positionings on the Subject of Psychology
Theory Psychology, August 1, 1995; 5(3): 361 - 368.
[Abstract]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
R. Harre
The Necessity of Personhood as Embodied Being
Theory Psychology, August 1, 1995; 5(3): 369 - 373.
[Abstract]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
H. J.M. Hermans
The Limitations of Logic in Defining the Self
Theory Psychology, August 1, 1995; 5(3): 375 - 382.
[Abstract]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
J. Shotter
A `Show' of Agency is Enough
Theory Psychology, August 1, 1995; 5(3): 383 - 390.
[Abstract]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
H. Fisher
Empty Sets or Empty Self: A Response to Comments on `Whose Right is it to Define the Self?'
Theory Psychology, August 1, 1995; 5(3): 391 - 400.
[Abstract]