This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Jost, J. T. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Toward a Wittgensteinian Social Psychology of Human Development

Yale University, josjoht{at}yalevm.cis.yale.edu

It has been suggested that Wittgenstein's work on the philosophy of psychology contains the seeds of an anti-individualistic alternative to mentalism and behaviorism. Along these lines, I propose a social psychological reading of Wittgenstein based on Zettel567 and related remarks. It is argued that Wittgenstein's views are social psychological because he claims that human behavior may be understood only in terms of the background of social practices and group norms, an assumption also shared by the social behaviorists Mead and Dewey. In particular, Wittgenstein emphasizes that psychological concepts, like all concepts, are systems of language-games supported by a complex variety of social practices, which he refers to as a form of life. According to Wittgenstein, people grow into the background assumptions of those around them through a process of socialization. On this view, human development is best understood as a progression through socio cultural sequences of increasingly complicated grammars. Some implications of Wittgenstein's account for contemporary developmental psychology are also discussed.

Theory & Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 1, 5-25 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354395051001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Mollaret Using Common Psychological Terms to Describe Other People: From Lexical Hypothesis to Polysemous Conception Theory Psychology, June 1, 2009; 19(3): 315 - 334. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. T. Jost and A. W. Kruglanski The Estrangement of Social Constructionism and Experimental Social Psychology: History of the Rift and Prospects for Reconciliation Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2002; 6(3): 168 - 187. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. J. Stam Ten Years after, Decade to Come: The Contributions of Theory to Psychology Theory Psychology, February 1, 2000; 10(1): 5 - 21. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. J. Gergen Emerging Challenges Redux Theory Psychology, February 1, 2000; 10(1): 23 - 30. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. V. Botschner Giving Scalops their Due: Reconstructing Social Constructionism as ANT Theory Psychology, October 1, 1999; 9(5): 713 - 715. [PDF]

				J. T. Jost and D. F. Gustafson Wittgenstein's Problem and the Methods of Psychology: How `Grammar Depends on Facts' Theory Psychology, August 1, 1998; 8(4): 463 - 479. [Abstract]

				J. T. Jost, A. W. Kruglanski, and T. O. Nelson Social Metacognition: An Expansionist Review Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 1998; 2(2): 137 - 154. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. T. Jost and C. D. Hardin The Practical Turn in Psychology: Marx and Wittgenstein as Social Materialists Theory Psychology, August 1, 1996; 6(3): 385 - 393. [Abstract]