This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Botschner, J. V. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Social Constructionism and the Pragmatic Entente: A Reply to Osbeck

University Of Guelph, JBOTSCHN{at}UOGUELPH.CA

Recently in these pages, Osbeck (1993) assessed the suitability of strong vs weak constructionism as an explanatory model for psychology. The evaluative criteria adopted by Osbeck were based on a pragmatic standard of usefulness to society. This standard included the concept of generativity, which eschews moral relativism by enshrining the dignity of the individual. Osbeck concluded that only weak constructionism has the capacity to fulfil the criteria entailed in the pragmatic standard. An inspection of the evaluative issues addressed by Osbeck shows that the relative advantages ascribed to weak constructionism are equivocal and stem mainly from its typically prescriptive presentations. Moreover, weak constructionism, as described by Osbeck, does not eliminate concerns about relativism as much as it banishes them from its neo-Kantian framework. Although a re-examination of the pragmatism of William James may offer hope for alternative psychologies, its promise may resonate more strongly with Wittgensteinian than Kantian epistemology.

Theory & Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 1, 145-151 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354395051008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. J. Gergen The Place of the Psyche in a Constructed World Theory Psychology, December 1, 1997; 7(6): 723 - 746. [Abstract]

				L. M. Osbeck Social Constructionism and the Pragmatic Standard Revisited: A Reply to Botschner Theory Psychology, February 1, 1995; 5(1): 153 - 157. [Abstract]