Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theory & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vogler, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reviews

Mom, and Pop Psychology: The Moving Picture Cure

Thomas A. Vogler

University Of Californla, Santa Cruz

Sometimes we can learn from a bad book as well as from a good one, if its `badness' is exemplary of normative practices rather than an isolated instance of incompetence. Such is the case with the book under scrutiny here. Although uniquely flawed in many ways, James B. Twitchell's Dreadful Pleasures: An Anatomy of Modem Horror (1985) is also typical of the perversions of scholarship that can be tolerated in the humanities by those who invoke the authority of `Psychology' as if it were a universal scientific discipline. This essay shows that while presuming to analyze the function of horror movies as an agency for teaching adolescents the imperatives of `healthy' sex and `proper' gender identifications, Twitchell is himself performing the same ideological function. As a book that advocates fear as a necessary method to force teenagers to conform to stereotyped norms of heterosexual behavior, it becomes part of the AIDS discourse even though it fails to address the topic.

Theory & Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 2, 243-261 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354393032009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?