This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Barclay, M. W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Utopia and Psychological Theory

New Directions Adolescent Services, Inc., Santa Rosa,CA

The following essay argues that the influence of a utopian ideology renders aspects of some psychologies inappropriate for the study of human beings. Utopianism in psychology functions as a totalizing discourse, a manner of speaking about society and human beings that tends towards homogeneity and totalitarian thought and decontextualizes human beings by seeking universal laws which attempt to reduce either behavior or cognition to totally explainable processes. Decontextualization is in some measure a function of the utopian legacy in natural science that began as a philosophy of pansophia, characterized in its goal of absolute knowledge and reflected in the goal of prediction and control of the environment. Theories that underwrite behaviorism and cognitivism are arguably utopian discourses. The legacy of utopian thinking in psychology defines the human being as a finite set of malleable structures which can be changed according to a prior definition of the `good', the `efficient' or fully `rational' person. This essay suggests that decontextualization, reductionistic description, essentialism and a quest for homogeneity are the result of the utopian legacy, and concludes that recontextualization of the subject should be sought by psychological research and therapeutic practice. This amounts to the rediscovery of human beings in the context of the lived world, as well as in the context of history and specific culture, in contrast to ideal places (utopias), ideal times (euchronias) or ideal ways of thinking (eupsychias).

Theory & Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 2, 173-190 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354393032002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. W. Barclay The Metaphoric Foundation of Literal Language: Towards a Theory of the Reification and Meaning of Psychological Constructs Theory Psychology, June 1, 1997; 7(3): 355 - 372. [Abstract]