Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theory & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slife, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, F. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Problematic Ontological Underpinnings of Positive Psychology

A Strong Relational Alternative

Brent D. Slife

BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY, slife{at}byu.edu

Frank C. Richardson

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, fcr{at}mail.utexas.edu

In this article, we contend that many of the problems delineated in this special issue on positive psychology stem from an unexamined philosophical premise—its ontology. The world of `ontology' is vast and somewhat ill defined, but here we mean simply assumptions of what is ultimately real and fundamental, especially regarding the self. We first clarify and compare two major ontologies of the self, one that we argue underlies and spawns problems for positive psychology and one that we will describe as a promising alternative for the project of positive psychology. We focus on three important features of this project: (1) commitment to an ideal of the `disinterested observer'; (2) emotional satisfaction as a key conception; and (3) the tendency to view human phenomena as decontextualized from culture, history, and even physical situations. These features will display both how one set of ontological premises has underlain mainstream positive psychology and how the alternative offers a fresh perspective that addresses many issues within the field.

Key Words: happiness • human nature • meaning • ontology • positive affect • positive psychology • relationality • relationship • well-being • wisdom

Theory & Psychology, Vol. 18, No. 5, 699-723 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354308093403


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
J. C. Christopher, F. C. Richardson, and B. D. Slife
Thinking through Positive Psychology
Theory Psychology, October 1, 2008; 18(5): 555 - 561.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
J. C. Christopher and S. Hickinbottom
Positive Psychology, Ethnocentrism, and the Disguised Ideology of Individualism
Theory Psychology, October 1, 2008; 18(5): 563 - 589.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
F. C. Richardson and C. B. Guignon
Positive Psychology and Philosophy of Social Science
Theory Psychology, October 1, 2008; 18(5): 605 - 627.
[Abstract] [PDF]