Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theory & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tissaw, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Making Sense of Neonatal Imitation

Michael A. Tissaw

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, COLLEGE AT POTSDAM, tissawma{at}potsdam.edu

This essay applies philosophical principles and method to compare `imitation' as it is used in everyday contexts with its use in laboratory research and theorizing on human neonates. Its primary goal is to demonstrate the practicability and effectiveness of a philosophical method of conceptual analysis and to suggest benefits of the method's use in contexts of empirical research and theorizing in psychology. A selective summary of research and theorizing including and subsequent to Meltzoff and Moore's experiments on neonatal imitation is followed by a discussion of general principles of conceptual analysis in the analytical tradition, including the distinction between `sense' and `nonsense'. The concept of imitation is analyzed toward producing a `conceptual snapshot' for direct comparison between its possibilities of use and meaning outside and in the laboratory. Analysis shows that the concept is virtually devoid of sense in latter contexts. Results of analysis are defended against possible objections and applied to some relevant theorizing.

Key Words: AIM mechanism • behavioral criteria • conceptual analysis • conceptual snapshot • intention • neonatal imitation • opaque ascription contexts • sense and nonsense

Theory & Psychology, Vol. 17, No. 2, 217-242 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354307075044
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?