Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theory & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stone, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Does Pragmatism Lead to Pluralism?

Exploring the Disagreement between Jerome Bruner and William James Regarding Pragmatism’s Goal

Rebecca Stone

New York

As its most basic mission, pragmatism sets out to determine an idea’s merit by examining its practical consequences, rather than through purely abstract evaluation. As a result of this emphasis on an idea’s effectiveness, the complex ways in which pragmatists conceive of abstract notions such as truth and self-concept are often overlooked. Close examination of the works of two pragmatist thinkers, William James and Jerome Bruner, reveals a crucial debate regarding pragmatism’s goal. The gap between the pragmatisms of James and Bruner can best be exposed by looking at their attitudes toward pluralism. For Bruner, pluralism is the goal of pragmatism from the outset of inquiry; in this model, pragmatism is used to mediate between multiple sets of beliefs. For James, however, a pragmatist must be open-minded, in that pragmatism is committed to examining all new ideas, but the goal of inquiry is to support one belief rather than many. The relationship of pluralism to pragmatism has crucial implications for the way in which the two thinkers conceive of the human capacity for self-knowledge.

Key Words: Bruner • James • narrative • pluralism • pragmatism • psychological self-knowledge

Theory & Psychology, Vol. 16, No. 4, 553-564 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354306066206
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?