Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theory & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baerveldt, C.
Right arrow Articles by Voestermans, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Culture, Emotion and the Normative Structure of Reality

Cor Baerveldt

University of Alberta, cor{at}ualberta.ca

Paul Voestermans

Radboud University, p.voestermans{at}psych.ru.nl

A central concern for a psychology of culture is the question of how people come to commit themselves to ‘shared’ forms of understanding. Although the ‘shared’ or social nature of human understanding has received ample attention in different forms of cultural psychology, what is lacking is an account of the normative ‘force’ or compellingness of cultural forms. We argue that both phenomenology and social constructionism have failed to acknowledge the inherently normative dimension of social and cultural life. For an alternative grounding of cultural psychology we turn to the work of Merleau-Ponty. We show that at the end of his life Merleau-Ponty was working on a theory of meaning that acknowledges the normative dimension of our affective engagements in the world as well as the affective dimension of our normative engagements. We argue that this theory may be a powerful alternative for a social constructionist approach to culture.

Key Words: belief • cultural psychology • emotions • expression • language • Merleau-Ponty • normative structure • perceptual faith • phenomenology • social constructionism

Theory & Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 4, 449-473 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354305054747


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
P. Daanen
Conscious and Non-Conscious Representation in Social Representations Theory: Social Representations from the Phenomenological Point of View
Culture Psychology, September 1, 2009; 15(3): 372 - 385.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
J. Cromby and D. J. Harper
Paranoia: A Social Account
Theory Psychology, June 1, 2009; 19(3): 335 - 361.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
T. Verheggen and C. Baerveldt
We Don't Share! The Social Representation Approach, Enactivism and the Ground for an Intrinsically Social Psychology
Culture Psychology, March 1, 2007; 13(1): 5 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]