Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theory & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCabe, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

On the Inadequacies of Theory of Mind Explanations of Schizophrenia

Alternative Accounts of Alternative Problems

Rosemarie McCabe

Queen Mary, University of Londonr.mccabe{at}qmul.ac.uk

An influential theory of schizophrenia proposes that it can be explained by an inability to understand and reason about the mental states of others. In particular, an inability to correctly infer the mental states of others is believed to give rise to delusions and other psychotic symptoms. Our recent research has shown that patients adequately represent their own and others’ mental states and use this competence to communicate successfully in naturalistic social interaction. In talk with delusional content, patients recognize that others do not agree with their delusional claims and are not persuaded by the justification they provide for these claims. Importantly, they recognize their own and others’ discomfort at the disagreement this causes. However, they do not revise their claims. It is the tenacity with which delusional claims are held that is striking. This is all the more interesting given their ability to appreciate and respond appropriately to others’ mental states and their evident discomfort in the face of others’ disagreement. Questions for further research are whether this incorrigibility is specific to delusions, psychotic symptoms or the condition generally, and why patients are so tenacious in disregarding others’ accounts of their problems.

Key Words: communication • psychotic symptoms • schizophrenia • Theory of Mind

Theory & Psychology, Vol. 14, No. 5, 738-752 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354304046187


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?