| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/0959354303136003 © 2003 SAGE Publications Mathematics, Measurement, Metaphor and Metaphysics IIAccounting for Galileos Fateful OmissionMeta Metrics, Inc.wfisher{at}lexile.com This paper continues the exposition begun in the previous paper (Fisher, 2003b) concerning philosophys metaphysical insistence on rigorous figuremeaning independence, and its own distrust of that insistence, turning now to the potential for a new metrological culture that values both the full integration of mathematics and measurement, and frequent, vigorous challenges to that integration. Recent criticisms of psychological measurement as subject to a quantitative or methodological imperative are evaluated in terms of the history of academic metaphysics developed in the previous paper. The thesis is proposed and defended that quantitative instruments effectively embody hermeneutic-mathematical metaphysics coordination of signifier and signified only when both within-and between-laboratory metrology studies are completed. Experimental tests of instrument functioning and social networks of laboratories collaborating in the creation and maintenance of metric standards are seen as vital to the emergence of a new metrological culture in the human sciences.
Key Words: mathematical thinking measurement metaphysics method postmodernism
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||

