| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Mathematics, Measurement, Metaphor and Metaphysics IImplications for Method in Postmodern ScienceMeta Metrics, Inc.wfisher{at}lexile.com This paper relates philosophys metaphysical insistence on rigorous figuremeaning independence, and its own distrust of that insistence, to the potential for improved quantitative and qualitative methods in the sciences. Following Wittgensteins admonition that we pay attention to our nonsense, a kind of Socratic double vision is needed to simultaneously accept (1) that any meaningful discourse necessarily requires a significant degree of signifiersignified coordination, and (2) that an ideal degree of such coordination is never achieved in practice. A metaphysically informed theory of scientific method begins from the mathematical and hermeneutic implications of figuremeaning coordination. This paper explores the mathematical metaphysics of science, critically evaluates the often repeated maxim that fields of study are only as scientific as they are mathematical, and suggests that some forms of quantification are more mathematically astute, metaphysically informed, pragmatic and effective than others. In conclusion, the qualitative and quantitative aspects of three key features of measurement are briefly explored: (1) the deconstructive display and exploration of significant anomaly; (2) the metaphorically and numerically reductive identification, via sufficient reason and sufficient statistics, of new variables; and (3) the constructive application of technologically embodied signthing coordinations in research and practice.
Key Words: mathematical thinking measurement metaphysics method positivism postmodernism
Theory & Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 6,
753-790 (2003) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||
