Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theory & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parker, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Jacques Lacan, Barred Psychologist

Ian Parker

Manchester Metropolitan University, I.A.Parker{at}mmu.ac.uk

This paper reviews a series of contradictions between the discipline of psychology and the work of Jacques Lacan. Psychology here is the academic and professional domain of theory and practice developed in Western, specifically Anglo-US American, culture to describe and explain behavioural and mental processes. Lacan is characterized with reference to the elaboration of his theoretical and clinical work, with the focus primarily on his own writings. The main argument is that there is a fundamental incompatibility between Lacan's work and psychological views of the individual subject, and therefore attempts to assimilate the two traditions are misconceived. This means that psychologists looking to Lacan for answers must question underlying assumptions about theory and methodology in their discipline if they are to take his work seriously. The incompatibility between Lacan and psychology also has important consequences for clinical psychologists who may wish to adopt ideas from the Lacanian tradition, for it highlights the dangers that psychology holds for psychoanalysis if psychological theories and methodologies are taken on good coin. The motif of Lacan as `barred psychologist' is designed to emphasize these arguments as well as the distinctive account of the human subject that his work entails.

Key Words: Lacan • psychoanalysis • psychology • subjectivity

Theory & Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 1, 95-115 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354303013001764


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qualitative ResearchHome page
B. Gough
A psycho-discursive approach to analysing qualitative interview data, with reference to a father--son relationship
Qualitative Research, November 1, 2009; 9(5): 527 - 545.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory Culture SocietyHome page
M. Billig
Lacan's Misuse of Psychology: Evidence, Rhetoric and the Mirror Stage
Theory Culture Society, July 1, 2006; 23(4): 1 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
I. Parker
Lacanian Discourse Analysis in Psychology: Seven Theoretical Elements
Theory Psychology, April 1, 2005; 15(2): 163 - 182.
[Abstract] [PDF]