Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theory & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Morss, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Social Construction in a World at Risk

Toward a Psychology of Experience

Benjamin Sylvester Bradley

Charles Sturt University, bbradley{at}csu.edu.au

John R. Morss

University of Otago, morjo483{at}student.otago.ac.nz

This essay sets up a relationship between social constructionism and the risk theory of Ulrich Beck. This dialogue is mutually enhancing. Risk theory adds a conceptualization of societal process to the relational focus of social constructionism as justified by Kenneth Gergen. It both establishes the particular character of a social world put at risk by its own modernization and proves the identity between individualization and societalization. Simultaneously, social constructionism goes beyond the traditionally individualized phenomenology of mental life in a way that is compatible with but as yet lacking in Beck's approach. Potential heir to the marriage we broker is something that stands outside the thinking of either partner: a psychology of experience. We argue that this psychology both bids fair to transform Enlightenment ambitions for the subject and provides a new conception of the task faced by the growing number of psychologists whose work is to grapple with the problems of those who live `at risk'.

Key Words: Enlightenment • epistemology • experience • individualization • modernization • phenomenology • politics • reflexivity • risk • social construction

Theory & Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 4, 509-531 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354302012004297
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?