Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theory & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barresi, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

From `the Thought is the Thinker' to `the Voice is the Speaker'

William James and the Dialogical Self

John Barresi

Dalhousie University, jbarres{at}is.dal.ca

In 1890, William James provided a rich account of self in his Principles of Psychology. Over a hundred years later, Hermans and his colleagues have provided an equally rich account of self, most particularly in Hermans and Kempen's The Dialogical Self (1993). One of the key distinctions in the former work is that between the `I' and `Me', a distinction that Hermans builds on in his concept of the dialogical self. Nevertheless, there are differences between the two theories of self that are developed out of this distinction. In the present article I look closely at some of the differences between the two theories, and also look closely at Bakhtin's contribution to the development of the dialogical self. Through a careful comparison of the works of James, Bakhtin and Hermans, I try to indicate how our understanding of the self has changed over the past hundred years or so. At the same time, the comparison of some of the central ideas of these three authors provides a basis for a critical evaluation of certain aspects of Hermans' theory of the dialogical self.

Key Words: Bakhtin • consciousness • dialogical self • Hermans • James • self

Theory & Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 2, 237-250 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354302012002632


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
P. Sullivan
Examining the Self-Other Dialogue through 'Spirit' and 'Soul'
Culture Psychology, March 1, 2007; 13(1): 105 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
V. Dahlqvist, S. Eriksson, A.-L. Glasberg, E. Lindahl, K. Lu tzen, G. Strandberg, A. Soderberg, V. Sorlie, and A. Norberg
Development of the Perceptions of Conscience Questionnaire
Nursing Ethics, March 1, 2007; 14(2): 181 - 193.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
A. Gillespie
Descartes' Demon: A Dialogical Analysis of Meditations on First Philosophy
Theory Psychology, December 1, 2006; 16(6): 761 - 781.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
L. Blackman
The Dialogical Self, Flexibility and the Cultural Production of Psychopathology
Theory Psychology, April 1, 2005; 15(2): 183 - 206.
[Abstract] [PDF]