This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Crandall, C. S. Articles by Schaller, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Social Psychology and the Pragmatic Conduct of Science

University of Kansas, crandall{at}ku.edu

Mark Schaller

University of British Columbia, schaller{at}cortex.psych.ubc.ca

We chart our agreements and disagreements with Wallach and Wallach's (2001) arguments. After listing some areas of agreement, we then make four arguments that undermine the Wallachs' project. First, we argue the discovery of `laws' is a goal neither of scientists nor of the discipline. Second, we suggest the Wallachs' claim that social psychological theories are infused with unfalsifiable theories about the nature of psychological variables misses the logical distinction between measurement models and conceptual hypotheses. Third, we look at the role that circularity plays in deductive logic and conclude that circularity is rarely a serious problem in practice. Fourth, we examine what effect bits of research have on scientific progress, and argue that `non-progressive' papers do not hinder progress. The best response to the Wallachs' concerns about social psychology is provided by a glance at progress within the field today. The state is very good; circularities, tautologies and untested assumptions do not pose a significant threat to progress in the science of social psychology.

Key Words: circularity • scientific progress • social psychology experiments • tautology

Theory & Psychology, Vol. 11, No. 4, 479-488 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354301114003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Wallach and M. A. Wallach A Response on Concepts, Laws and Measurement in Social Psychology Theory Psychology, August 1, 2001; 11(4): 489 - 494. [Abstract] [PDF]