Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theory & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Individuality in Cultural Context

The Case for Psychological Agency

Adelbert H. Jenkins

New York University, jenkins{at}xp.psych.nyu.edu

In recent decades social science writing has given renewed attention to the notion of the self in human functioning. One tradition in social science writing has emphasized the importance of sociocultural influences on self-development, and some theorists seem to argue that such factors are primary in understanding the sense of individuality. This paper takes issue with the strong statement of this `social constructionist' view. While it is true that the content of personhood is fashioned in social context and varies across cultures, irreducible processes of individual human psychological agency also contribute to the development and functioning of the person. The universal capacity for `dialectical' thinking is discussed here as one such process. The importance of individual agency is highlighted in an example from a `sociocentrically' organized society. Both social and individual psychological perspectives are necessary to obtain a better grasp of the complexity of individuality.

Key Words: agency • dialectical thinking • self • social constructionism

Theory & Psychology, Vol. 11, No. 3, 347-362 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354301113004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
A. Stetsenko and I. M. Arievitch
The Self in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory: Reclaiming the Unity of Social and Individual Dimensions of Human Development
Theory Psychology, August 1, 2004; 14(4): 475 - 503.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
J. Shotter and J. W. Lannamann
The Situation of Social Constructionism: Its `hnprisonment' within the Ritual of Theory-Criticism-and-Debate
Theory Psychology, October 1, 2002; 12(5): 577 - 609.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
B. S. Held
What Follows?: Mind Dependence, Fallibility and Transcendence According to (Strong) Constructionism's Realist and Quasi-Realist Critics
Theory Psychology, October 1, 2002; 12(5): 651 - 669.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
M. W. Katzko
The Construction of `Social Constructionism': A Case Study in the Rhetoric of Debate
Theory Psychology, October 1, 2002; 12(5): 671 - 683.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
R. Mather
Gergen's Social Constructionism: Postmodern or Post-Hegelian?
Theory Psychology, October 1, 2002; 12(5): 695 - 699.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
K. J. Gergen
Construction in Contention: Toward Consequential Resolutions
Theory Psychology, June 1, 2001; 11(3): 419 - 432.
[Abstract] [PDF]