Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theory & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hibberd, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Gergen's Social Constructionism, Logical Positivism and the Continuity of Error

Part 1: Conventionalism

Fiona J. Hibberd

University of Sydney, fionah{at}psych.usyd.edu.au

It is the received wisdom that K.J. Gergen's postmodernist metatheory of psychological science—social constructionism-is the anti-thesis of positivist philosophy of science. If by `antithetical' it is meant that the two share nothing that is central to each, this view is mistaken. One of the links between social constructionism and logical positivism is that both embody conventionalism. This is not a minor similarity between two otherwise different theories. Conventionalism involves the claim that theories (or certain parts of theories) are non-empirical because they are not forced on us by nature but adopted for non-epistemic reasons. Despite differences in the way social constructionism and logical positivism conceptualize conventionalism, certain features of Gergen's theory are clearly evident in the theories of Schlick, Reichenbach and Carnap. The logical positivists' difficulty in consistently maintaining a conventionalist account of scientific theory is repeated by Gergen, though camouflaged by the Modern-day flavour of his metatheory.

Key Words: conventionalism • history • metatheory • philosophy of science, • positivism • social constructionism

Theory & Psychology, Vol. 11, No. 3, 297-321 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354301113002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Philosophy of the Social SciencesHome page
N. Edley
Irony and Origami
Philosophy of the Social Sciences, March 1, 2007; 37(1): 100 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
N. Mackay
Psychotherapy and the Idea of Meaning
Theory Psychology, June 1, 2003; 13(3): 359 - 386.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
S. McNamee
Bridging Incommensurate Discourses: A Response to Mackay
Theory Psychology, June 1, 2003; 13(3): 387 - 396.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
N. Mackay
On `Just Not Getting It': A Reply to McNamee and to Raskin and Neimeyer
Theory Psychology, June 1, 2003; 13(3): 411 - 419.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
J. Michell
The Quantitative Imperative: Positivism, Naive Realism and the Place of Qualitative Methods in Psychology
Theory Psychology, February 1, 2003; 13(1): 5 - 31.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
J. Shotter and J. W. Lannamann
The Situation of Social Constructionism: Its `hnprisonment' within the Ritual of Theory-Criticism-and-Debate
Theory Psychology, October 1, 2002; 12(5): 577 - 609.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
B. S. Held
What Follows?: Mind Dependence, Fallibility and Transcendence According to (Strong) Constructionism's Realist and Quasi-Realist Critics
Theory Psychology, October 1, 2002; 12(5): 651 - 669.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
M. W. Katzko
The Construction of `Social Constructionism': A Case Study in the Rhetoric of Debate
Theory Psychology, October 1, 2002; 12(5): 671 - 683.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
F. J. Hibberd
Reply to Gergen
Theory Psychology, October 1, 2002; 12(5): 685 - 694.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
R. Mather
Gergen's Social Constructionism: Postmodern or Post-Hegelian?
Theory Psychology, October 1, 2002; 12(5): 695 - 699.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
D. J. Nightingale and J. Cromby
Social Constructionism as Ontology: Exposition and Example
Theory Psychology, October 1, 2002; 12(5): 701 - 713.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
F. J. Hibberd
Gergen's Social Constructionism, Logical Positivism and the Continuity of Error: Part 2: Meaning-as-Use
Theory Psychology, June 1, 2001; 11(3): 323 - 346.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
K. J. Gergen
Construction in Contention: Toward Consequential Resolutions
Theory Psychology, June 1, 2001; 11(3): 419 - 432.
[Abstract] [PDF]