|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Gergen's Social Constructionism, Logical Positivism and the Continuity of Error
Part 1: Conventionalism
Fiona J. Hibberd
University of Sydney, fionah{at}psych.usyd.edu.au
It is the received wisdom that K.J. Gergen's postmodernist metatheory of psychological sciencesocial constructionism-is the anti-thesis of positivist philosophy of science. If by `antithetical' it is meant that the two share nothing that is central to each, this view is mistaken. One of the links between social constructionism and logical positivism is that both embody conventionalism. This is not a minor similarity between two otherwise different theories. Conventionalism involves the claim that theories (or certain parts of theories) are non-empirical because they are not forced on us by nature but adopted for non-epistemic reasons. Despite differences in the way social constructionism and logical positivism conceptualize conventionalism, certain features of Gergen's theory are clearly evident in the theories of Schlick, Reichenbach and Carnap. The logical positivists' difficulty in consistently maintaining a conventionalist account of scientific theory is repeated by Gergen, though camouflaged by the Modern-day flavour of his metatheory.
Key Words: conventionalism history metatheory philosophy of science, positivism social constructionism
Theory & Psychology, Vol. 11, No. 3,
297-321 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354301113002

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Edley
Irony and Origami
Philosophy of the Social Sciences,
March 1, 2007;
37(1):
100 - 104.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Mackay
Psychotherapy and the Idea of Meaning
Theory Psychology,
June 1, 2003;
13(3):
359 - 386.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. McNamee
Bridging Incommensurate Discourses: A Response to Mackay
Theory Psychology,
June 1, 2003;
13(3):
387 - 396.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Mackay
On `Just Not Getting It': A Reply to McNamee and to Raskin and Neimeyer
Theory Psychology,
June 1, 2003;
13(3):
411 - 419.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Michell
The Quantitative Imperative: Positivism, Naive Realism and the Place of Qualitative Methods in Psychology
Theory Psychology,
February 1, 2003;
13(1):
5 - 31.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Shotter and J. W. Lannamann
The Situation of Social Constructionism: Its `hnprisonment' within the Ritual of Theory-Criticism-and-Debate
Theory Psychology,
October 1, 2002;
12(5):
577 - 609.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. S. Held
What Follows?: Mind Dependence, Fallibility and Transcendence According to (Strong) Constructionism's Realist and Quasi-Realist Critics
Theory Psychology,
October 1, 2002;
12(5):
651 - 669.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. W. Katzko
The Construction of `Social Constructionism': A Case Study in the Rhetoric of Debate
Theory Psychology,
October 1, 2002;
12(5):
671 - 683.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. J. Hibberd
Reply to Gergen
Theory Psychology,
October 1, 2002;
12(5):
685 - 694.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Mather
Gergen's Social Constructionism: Postmodern or Post-Hegelian?
Theory Psychology,
October 1, 2002;
12(5):
695 - 699.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Nightingale and J. Cromby
Social Constructionism as Ontology: Exposition and Example
Theory Psychology,
October 1, 2002;
12(5):
701 - 713.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. J. Hibberd
Gergen's Social Constructionism, Logical Positivism and the Continuity of Error: Part 2: Meaning-as-Use
Theory Psychology,
June 1, 2001;
11(3):
323 - 346.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. J. Gergen
Construction in Contention: Toward Consequential Resolutions
Theory Psychology,
June 1, 2001;
11(3):
419 - 432.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|