Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Theory & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Psychology and the Art of Living

Steven D. Brown

Loughborough University, S.D.Brown{at}lboro.ac.uk

A weakness of contemporary social constructionist work is its overarching concern with discourse at the expense of a thoroughgoing analysis of non-discursive phenomena. Alternative analytics such as materiality, embodiment or power engender their own problems. Using the example of multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) discussed by Kroll-Smith and Floyd (1997), this paper works through a number of approaches that may redress this lack of concern for the non-discursive. Drawing variously on Foucault, Heidegger and Deleuze, these approaches call for a renewed engagement with the aesthetic as a means of understanding the concrete work of ordering and stylizing the world in which persons engage. That is, an `art of living'. Issues of composition, truth, performance and expression are entailed. This results in an account of the intertwining of the discursive and the non-discursive, and an exploration of the possibilities such a conception offers for social constructionist psychology.

Key Words: aesthetics • discourse • Foucault • non-discursive • social constructionism

Theory & Psychology, Vol. 11, No. 2, 171-192 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354301112002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
D. J. Nightingale and J. Cromby
Social Constructionism as Ontology: Exposition and Example
Theory Psychology, October 1, 2002; 12(5): 701 - 713.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
D. Middleton
Succession and Change in the Sociocultural Use of Memory: Building-in the Past in Communicative Action
Culture Psychology, March 1, 2002; 8(1): 79 - 95.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
S. D. Brown, D. Middleton, and G. Lightfoot
Performing the Past in Electronic Archives: Interdependencies in the Discursive and Non-Discursive Ordering of Institutional Rememberings
Culture Psychology, June 1, 2001; 7(2): 123 - 144.
[Abstract] [PDF]