This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Polkinghoime, D. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Psychological Inquiry and the Pragmatic and Hermeneutic Traditions

University of Southern California, polkingh{at}usc.edu

Psychological practitioner inquiry differs in kind from psychological researcher inquiry. From the perspective of researcher inquiry, practice should consist of applying research-generated knowledge. Because practitioners consistently report that this is not how they approach their clients, and because the epistemological foundations of psychology research inquiry have been questioned, it is necessary to study how practitioners actually engage in practice. The hermeneutic tradition of Heidegger and Gadamer and the pragmatic tradition of Dewey provide a philosophical groundwork for the study of practitioner inquiry. Gadamer and Dewey propose that in everyday functioning people primarily act out of their internalized, culturally provided knowledge, which primarily functions outside of awareness. However, they also hold that people are not locked into their socially transmitted backgrounds. People can advance the effectiveness of their received practical knowledge through reflective inquiry and trial-and-error activity. People learn from the effect of these trials and thereby expand their background understandings. For ordinary everyday functioning, psychological practitioners are assumed to engage in a process similar to the one outlined by Dewey and Gadamer.

Key Words: everydayness • hermeneutics • inquiry • practical knowledge • pragmatism

Theory & Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 4, 453-479 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354300104002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Brinkmann Human Kinds and Looping Effects in Psychology: Foucauldian and Hermeneutic Perspectives Theory Psychology, December 1, 2005; 15(6): 769 - 791. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Sullivan and J. McCarthy A Dialogical Approach to Experience-based Inquiry Theory Psychology, October 1, 2005; 15(5): 621 - 638. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Brinkmann Psychology as a Moral Science: Aspects of John Dewey's Psychology History of the Human Sciences, February 1, 2004; 17(1): 1 - 28. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Eaton Psychotherapy and Moral Inquiry Theory Psychology, June 1, 2002; 12(3): 367 - 386. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Valsiner The First Six Years: Culture's Adventures in Psychology Culture Psychology, March 1, 2001; 7(1): 5 - 48. [Abstract] [PDF]