This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Coulter, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Is the `New Sentence Problem' a Genuine Problem?

Boston University

The theoretical problem of explaining how people can produce and understand `sentences' they have never heard before has, for some time, been at the center of psycholinguistic and cognitive theorizing. It has rarely been questioned as a coherently formulated `problem' in itself. In recent years, however, a range of conceptual criticisms has been advanced from within the Wittgensteinian tradition. A consideration of these criticisms in relation to Chomsky's various formulations constitutes the main purpose of this paper. Among the critical issues discussed are: (1) the compositional theory of linguistic behavior which was developed as part of the solution to the new sentence (projection) problem; (2) the conception of linguistic comprehension which underlies it; (3) the `ideas/utterance' translation assumption; (4) the characterization of language learning embraced by the treatment of the projection problem; (5) the internal rule-system model; and (6) alternative versions of the phenomena grouped under the `new sentence problem'.

Theory & Psychology, Vol. 1, No. 3, 317-336 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0959354391013003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Nishizaka Imagination in Action Theory Psychology, April 1, 2003; 13(2): 177 - 207. [Abstract] [PDF]